Webmaster Forums 101 - Free Help and Discussions
 
 
 

MEMBER REWARDS - Earn free advertising by participating in these forums! Click here for details.

Welcome to Webmaster Forums 101!

You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions, articles and access our other FREE features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload your own photos and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today!

If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact contact support.

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old 30th May 2005, 03:44 PM   #1
Mr. Tech's Avatar

Username: Mr. Tech
Rank: Problem Solver
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Gold Coast, Australia
Posts: 2,166
Points: 1,025.61
Send a message via MSN to Mr. Tech
Default New Webmaster Tools

I added a few more webmaster tools to the website.

Tools include:

HTML Validator
CSS Validator
Broken Link Checker
IP Address Locator

I also updated the Color Chart so that it is compatible with most of the major browsers. It also has a couple of other features added...
__________________
Please read the Forum Rules

Get rewarded for posting
- free advertising!

.::. [ Webmaster Resources ] .::. [ Web Design ] .::. [ Developer Tutorials ] .::.
Mr. Tech is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 31st May 2005, 09:39 AM   #2
J.K.'s Avatar

Username: J.K.
Rank: WF101 Member
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 42
Points: 0.00
Default

Good deal, Tech..

Have you considered adding the CSE Validtaor also?

http://online.htmlvalidator.com/php/onlinevallite.php

I use W3C and this one but often find I like the CSE better. I believe you can also make a little affiliate money with it as there is advanced software version.
J.K. is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 31st May 2005, 09:57 AM   #3
Mr. Tech's Avatar

Username: Mr. Tech
Rank: Problem Solver
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Gold Coast, Australia
Posts: 2,166
Points: 1,025.61
Send a message via MSN to Mr. Tech
Default

LOL, that has to be the lognest text field I've ever come across

It didn't find any errors on my site but it said the pro version did. I'll download a trial of it and see what it's like.
__________________
Please read the Forum Rules

Get rewarded for posting
- free advertising!

.::. [ Webmaster Resources ] .::. [ Web Design ] .::. [ Developer Tutorials ] .::.
Mr. Tech is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 31st May 2005, 10:09 AM   #4
J.K.'s Avatar

Username: J.K.
Rank: WF101 Member
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 42
Points: 0.00
Default

lol - I think you're right..

how you like the results though.
J.K. is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 31st May 2005, 10:22 AM   #5
Mr. Tech's Avatar

Username: Mr. Tech
Rank: Problem Solver
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Gold Coast, Australia
Posts: 2,166
Points: 1,025.61
Send a message via MSN to Mr. Tech
Default

The results were good. Very detailed and easy to understand. The only problem is that it doesn't show all the errors. You need to Paid versions for that.
__________________
Please read the Forum Rules

Get rewarded for posting
- free advertising!

.::. [ Webmaster Resources ] .::. [ Web Design ] .::. [ Developer Tutorials ] .::.
Mr. Tech is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 31st May 2005, 10:39 AM   #6
J.K.'s Avatar

Username: J.K.
Rank: WF101 Member
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 42
Points: 0.00
Default

'doesn't show all the errors'

That's true, but in terms of this tool I think we'd have to say that it shows more than the W3C.

I know that sounds a little odd. However, I can get some pages to validate fine at the W3C, but in this tool I'll find some new recommendations.

I've not used it a lot, but I think those recommendations (or perhaps errors) are designed to move you toward XHTML 1.0 Strict..
J.K. is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 31st May 2005, 10:45 AM   #7
Mr. Tech's Avatar

Username: Mr. Tech
Rank: Problem Solver
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Gold Coast, Australia
Posts: 2,166
Points: 1,025.61
Send a message via MSN to Mr. Tech
Default

I think you're right about the XHTML 1.0 Strict. I think W3C validates the page just for the doctype used... CSE is a little more picky...

I think it would be a good idea to use the W3C Validator and then the CSE HTML Validator. This way you've got two opinions.

Another validator is the one located at htmlhelp.com but it is very similar to the W3C.
__________________
Please read the Forum Rules

Get rewarded for posting
- free advertising!

.::. [ Webmaster Resources ] .::. [ Web Design ] .::. [ Developer Tutorials ] .::.
Mr. Tech is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Login
User Name
Password


Featured Members


Featured Links


Useful Resources
Webmaster Resources
Developers Tools
Developer Tutorials


Partners

All times are GMT +10. The time now is 12:29 PM.


Powered by vBulletin Version 3.5.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 2.3.2
 
 
WEBMASTER FORUMS 101
ARCHIVE
CONTACT US
TOP
   
© Webmaster Forums 101 2005. All Rights Reserved.
Design by: vBCore